Back to ArticlesBack

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest articles and resources sent straight to your inbox.

MPUG

This is the last of four articles I’ve written recently on the topic of on tracking a project. I have outlined a four-step tracking cycle: set the status date, enter actuals and revisions, reschedule incomplete work, and level the remaining schedule.

To explore the last step, let’s consider an example. The below schedule was baselined after initial resource leveling. It is 11 days long. Resource R is constrained to two units.

Figure 1: Baselined schedule prior to tracking

The project started as planned on October 4th. The first weekly status was October 8th. Only two days were spent on Task A. Task B was completed, but Task D was not started. Hence dependent Task F was not started. Incomplete work was rescheduled to start after the status date, resulting in a split of Task A and a Schedule No Earlier Than (SNET) constraint being placed on Task D and Task F.

Entering actuals and rescheduling incomplete work created resource overallocations in the remaining schedule. The underutilization of resource R in the first week caused the shifting of four days of work into the remaining schedule.

Figure 2: Remaining schedule with resource over allocations

In the Leveling Options dialog, the schedule is leveled from the Status Date through the end of the schedule. You do not want to level the entire schedule since this potentially would overwrite portions of the actual schedule from the beginning of the project. Note that the “To:” date may need to be extended to cover the potential expansion of the schedule during leveling.

If we choose to clear the prior leveling in the remaining schedule (by checking the Clear leveling values before leveling box), the leveling yields a 14-day schedule. During the day-by-day leveling starting after October 8th, Task E is critical on October 15th and that is why it is scheduled before Task F.

Figure 3: Leveling Options dialog with Clear Leveling Values before leveling box checked

Figure 4: Leveled remaining schedule, with Task E scheduled before Task F

If we choose to not clear the prior leveling within the remaining schedule (unchecking the box), we get a different 14-day leveling of the remaining schedule. With the prior leveling not cleared, Task F is critical on October 15th and is scheduled before Task E.

Figure 5: Leveling Options dialog with Clear leveling values before leveling box unchecked

Figure 6: Leveling remaining schedule, with Task F scheduled before Task E

Just as one may want to explore different leveling options prior to creating the baseline schedule, one should explore different leveling options for the remaining schedule. Project shows you only one leveling solution at a time based on the options you select. The one you are looking at may not be the best. As discussed in my prior MPUG postings on the subject, there is a distribution of leveling solutions. In this example, there was no difference in the project duration of the leveling’s. That will not always be the case.

Get Weekly PM Insights

Join 500,000+ PMs receiving updates on the latest PM methodologies, PDU opportunities, tool reviews, career tips, and member exclusives.

PMI ATP
PMI Authorized Training Partner
REP #4082

Learning Paths

PMP® TrainingCAPM® TrainingPgMP® TrainingPMI-ACP® TrainingMS ProjectMS PlannerMS TeamsJira

PM Resources

PDU TrackerLive WebinarsSalary CalculatorTool ComparisonsJob BoardKnowledge BasePM Glossary

Community

Discussion ForumStudy GroupsEvents Calendar

Follow Us

LinkedInYouTubeTwitterFacebook
MPUG Logo

© 2025 MPUG. All rights reserved.

TermsPrivacySitemap
Articles

Level Remaining Schedule During Tracking

This is the last of four articles I’ve written recently on the topic of on tracking a project. I have outlined a four-step tracking cycle:  set the status date, enter […]

3 min read
•almost 4 years ago••
R
Robin NicklasAuthor
Project Management
Microsoft Project
Best Practices
Productivity
R
Robin Nicklas

Content Writer

Robin Nicklas is a project management consultant and educator. Since 2001, he has trained project managers in the aerospace, financial, telecommunications, government, and software sectors. Prior to teaching, he spent twenty years in information systems and technology, twelve of which he managed software development at large information service companies. Since 2003, he has taught graduate and undergraduate courses in project management at the University of Washington in Seattle, as well as MS Project courses at Bellevue College Continuing Education since 2011. Robin is a former president of the PMI Puget Sound Chapter in Seattle and a certified PMP. He can be contacted through his website, robinnicklas.com.

View all articles by Robin Nicklas
Related Content

Continue Reading

Discover more insights and articles that complement your current reading

Two Project Manager Agent Features You Might Like
Articles
5 min read

Two Project Manager Agent Features You Might Like

Discover two game-changing features of Microsoft’s Project Manager Agent including agent-to-agent communication and the new integrated interface in Planner.

E
Erik van Hurck
about 1 month ago
Read
Master Dependency Analysis in Microsoft Project with SSI Tools!
Articles
2 min read

Master Dependency Analysis in Microsoft Project with SSI Tools!

Learn how to master dependency analysis in Microsoft Project using SSI Tools’ Directional Path, Connecting Path, and Dependency Tracer to analyze predecessors, successors, and project logic.

K
Kenny Arnold
about 1 month ago
Read
A PM’s Halloween Survival Guide
Articles
5 min read

A PM’s Halloween Survival Guide

Discover the spooky parallels between Halloween and project management, from scope creep monsters to ghosted team members, in this fun survival guide for PMs.

R
Ronald B. Smith, MBA, PMP
2 months ago
Read
Explore All Articles