Over a decade ago, I was put in charge of a group of projects. One of the projects had been running for almost a year, but had never seen a single live release to the customer! I realized there were too many unresolved risks, and asked the concerned project manager to put risk management, a new concept in the organization, as a top priority. Post identification and qualification of risks, any risk above the risk threshold value had to be brought down. If that was not done, I advised him no one should be allowed to work on the concerned project tasks. This touched a raw-nerve.

One day a senior executive dropped by and asked about the guidance I had given to the project manager. In his mind, risk identification, qualification, and addition of reserves et al are sufficient, and I should not have stopped people from working on tasks.

My response was: “When you know a cyclone is going to hit in five days, do you wait to act on the fifth day or do you start immediately working to mitigate the expected impact?”

To elaborate a bit more, if a cyclone is about to hit, will risk identification help? Will risk qualification help? You know it won’t do much, though needed. How about quantification and adding reserves – say various cyclone shelters, food stock, etc. – will those help? Yes, but not fully. What is most needed in such a situation is risk mitigation. We can’t change the probability of the cyclone, but the first act of mitigation would be the evacuation of people. Risk mitigation is one risk response strategy.

In this article, I’d like to explore various such strategies.

At this stage, it’s important to note that risk response strategies are applicable in cases of both negative risks (threats) and positive risks (opportunities). You can learn more on individual project threats and opportunities here.

Risk Response Planning

The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®) guide from the Project Management Institute (PMI®) has a specific process to develop various risk response strategies. It’s called Plan Risk Responses, and it’s defined as follows:

“Plan Risk Responses is the process of developing options, selecting strategies, and agreeing on actions to address overall project risk exposure, as well as to treat individual project risks.”

The goal here is to develop risk response options, strategies, and actions for both individual project risks and overall project risk. In other words, you are planning to minimize the threats (negative risks) and enhance opportunities (positive risks). With this process, the project manager  allocates resources and inserts items and activities within the documents and the project management plan, in order to address said risks.

Obviously, both the Risk Register and Risk Reports are needed as inputs to address such risks (along with the Risk Management Plan). Remember, we are addressing both individual risks and overall project risk. See this depicted in the below flow diagram, with the highlighted process of Plan Risk Responses.

As shown, once you have the risk response strategies and associated actions, both the Risk Register and Risk Report have to be updated. You can learn more about the above flow diagram in this article on risk management framework.

Risk Response Strategies – What Happens?

In the Plan Risk Responses process, for the negative risks, we are trying to move the High Probability and High Impact risks to be of Low Probability and Low Impact, by taking response actions. The reverse is also true.

I’ve explained this in the below video [duration: 3m: 53s], the content of which has been taken from RMP Live Lessons. For the best experience, you may want to go full-screen in HD mode and plug-in your earphones.

Risk Response Strategies for Threats

Now, let’s look at various response strategies for individual negative risks or threats.

Escalate Response Strategy

The escalate response strategy is used when the project team or the project sponsor agrees that:

• The threat is outside the scope of the project.
• The project manager does not have the authority for the proposed response.

At this point, the risk is escalated to a program or portfolio or other suitable level. The project manager determines who should be notified. The escalated entity should be notified and the entity should also accept it. After escalation, the risk is not monitored by the team, but may be recorded in the Risk Register.

Example: A risk occurring in another project is impacting your project, so you escalate it to the level of a program or a portfolio.

Avoid Response Strategy

This response strategy is usually used for high priority risks, i.e., risks with high probability and a big negative impact. We can do two things here, either:

• Eliminate the risk completely, or,
• Protect the project from its impact.

Most of the time, the first (avoidance or elimination) is taken by changing the project management plan.

Example: You use a reliable technology platform for your project, instead of an unreliable, but cutting edge one.

Transfer Response Strategy

Transfer of a risk is done by shifting the impact to a 3rd party, who will own the response. This method is usually best used for low impact risks. A risk premium has to be paid to the 3rd party.

Example: You go for an incentivized contract, such as Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), to transfer the risks to the buyer.

For more information about incentivized contracts, go to this article of point of total assumption. Do note that by transferring the risks, they are not gone! Rather, they will be addressed by the entity to which risks have been transferred.

TIP:   Some risk management practitioners use the terms, Deflect or Allocate, in place of Transfer risk to refer to this response strategy.

Mitigate Response Strategy

With a mitigate response strategy, you try to reduce the probability and/or impact of the risk. This is used for high priority risks (with high P and high I values). After reduction, the risk score should be within an acceptable threshold limit. You can learn more about the usage of risk threshold in this article on end-to-end risk management.

Example: You first build a prototype for a highly scalable product before going for full-fledged development.

Where mitigation is not possible due to probability, it’s best to look for mitigation responses which pull down the impact.

TIP:   While Avoid and Mitigate risk response strategies are used for high-priority threats, Transfer and Accept response strategies are for best used for low-priority ones.

Accept Response Strategy

In risk acceptance, no action is taken unless the risk occurs. Like transfer strategy, it’s used for low priority threats or used when it’s not possible to have a cost-effective solution which addresses the threat. The Project Management Plan is usually not changed in this case. A common risk acceptance strategy is to use contingency reserve.

Example: If there are frequent climate changes, you may accept such as a risk for your project.

TIP:   One of the commonly used acceptance strategies for actively accepted risks is to use a Contingency Reserve. This is for both individual threats and opportunities.

Risk Response Strategies for Opportunities

Like threats, there also can be a number of risk response strategies for individual positive risks or opportunities.

Escalate Response Strategy

It’s very similar to the one we have seen earlier for negative risks, except that in this case it is for positive risks or opportunities. It’s used when the project team or the project sponsor agrees that the threat is outside the scope of the project and the project manager does not have the authority for proposed response.

Again, after escalation, the risk is not monitored by the team, but may be recorded in the Risk Register.

Example: A benefit occurring in another project has implications for your project and you escalate such to the level of a program.

Exploit Response Strategy

With this risk response strategy, you seek to eliminate uncertainty by ensuring that the opportunity is realized or that it definitely happens. It’s used for high priority opportunities.  A payment of a risk premium can be involved for the party taking on the opportunity.

Example: Using talented resources to complete work early with less cost.

Share Response Strategy

In this case, you allocate some or all of ownership of the opportunity to a third party. Because it’s a share response strategy, both sides benefit – the first owner and also the sharing owner. It can be considered the “mirror” part of transfer response strategy, which we have seen earlier for individual negative risks.

Unlike transfer, it is not completely handed over to another party. It is shared; however, risk sharing, like transfer response strategy, often involves premium payment.

Example: Your organization forms a joint venture or partnership with another organization to execute the project considering the benefits involved for both.

Enhance Response Strategy

With this response strategy, you increase the probability and/or the impact of an opportunity. Early enhancement is considered more effective. If you cannot increase the probability, try to increase the impact.

Example: You add more features to a product to sell more products.

Accept Response Strategy

In this case, if the opportunity arises, it will be taken advantage of, but not actively pursued. It’s usually considered for low priority opportunities or if no cost-effective solution is available.

Example: A new project will takes advantage of a tax break, if an expected legislation is passed.

TIP:   While Exploit and Enhance risk response strategies are used for high-priority opportunities, Share and Accept response strategies are for low-priority ones.

A Real-World Example and Exercise

Now that we have reviewed various risk response strategies, let’s do an exercise.

Scenario: You are driving to reach your office and become aware of possible heavy traffic on your traveling route through a radio warning or via global positioning system (GPS). Regardless, you have to reach your destination to attend an important meeting. You have the following options available, outlined in the below table.

Can you tell, based on the situation presented, which risk response strategy will best fit? Do note that the scenarios presented are for negative risks, and your response should be one of the strategies for each question.

I would suggest that you try this exercise on your own first before checking the solution, but I’ve explained in the below video [duration: 7m: 20s], taken from my RMP Live Lessons course what I advise. This clip also addresses an additional question related to contingency reserve and how it’s used in our scenario.

Comparison

As we reach the end of this article, I’d like to draw a comparison between the risk response strategies for threats vs. opportunities in the below table:

Finally, it’s not that an individual threat will have a single response strategy. If a threat can’t be avoided, then a project manager can mitigate to a level where it becomes viable to accept or transfer it. Similarly, if an opportunity can’t be fully exploited, it can be enhanced to a level where it can be viable to accept or share it.

References:

[1] Course: RMP Live Lessons, Guaranteed Pass or Your Money Back, by Satya Narayan Dash

[2] Course: RMP 30 Contact Hours with Money Back Guarantee, by Satya Narayan Dash

[3] Book: I Want To Be A RMP, The Plain and Simple Way, Second Edition, by Satya Narayan Dash