Back to ArticlesBack

Join 50,000+ PM Professionals

Get expert PM insights, PMP prep tips, and earn PDUs with exclusive content delivered weekly.

Protected by reCAPTCHA: Privacy & Terms

MPUG - Master Project User GroupMPUG - Master Project User Group

This is the sixth article of this series highlighting common incorrect uses of Microsoft Project. The images are built using the Microsoft Project 2013 Pro edition, but this series can be useful for all versions of the product. This article will be about linking summary tasks.

Flaw #1: Date-Related Planning

Flaw #2: Capacity as Activity 

Flaw #3: Lack of Structure (Work Breakdown Structure)

Flaw #4: Too Much Detail in the Schedule

Flaw #5: Not Using the Baseline Functionality 

This flaw is easily created in your schedule when you are building your list of activities and want to indent or outdent after you have set your predecessors. The line of thought is even an understandable one: “Phase Y can’t start after phase X is done”. However, it is not a phase that starts or finishes! The activities and milestones within the phases start or finish.

This is what it looks like in a schedule:

flaw6_1

Thinking logically, it isn’t phase 1 that is needed for phase 2. It’s the approved PID that is needed for the starting task.

In complex schedules it’s often possible for a phase to overlap another. With linked summary tasks, this will not be possible – it would create a false gap in your schedule. There is even chance that you run into a circular reference error with the following text:

You are trying to link a task to another task that has a series of task links back to the first task. You cannot do this because it would create a circular task relationship with other tasks.

Finding the links

Luckily there is an easy way to check for these links in Microsoft Project. Using the Gantt chart view, and filtering this view to show just summary tasks, you can now view the predecessors. If there are any they should be deleted. Going back to the example this would be your view:

flaw6_2

The summary tasks are all bold text, so finding a predecessor link will be extra easy.

That’s it for now, if you have any suggestions for posts please let me know.


Related Content

Webinars (watch for free now!):
Webinar: Digging Deeper – Learning More about Using Task Mode and Task Dependencies

Articles:
11 Quick Tips for Project Managers


Get Weekly PM Insights

Join 50,000+ PMs receiving updates on the latest PM methodologies, PDU opportunities, tool reviews, career tips, and member exclusives.

Protected by reCAPTCHA: Privacy & Terms

PMI ATP
PMI Authorized Training Partner
REP #4082

Learning Paths

PMP® TrainingCAPM® TrainingPgMP® TrainingPMI-ACP® TrainingMS ProjectMS PlannerMS TeamsJira

PM Resources

PDU TrackerLive WebinarsSalary CalculatorTool ComparisonsJob BoardKnowledge BasePM Glossary

Community

Discussion ForumStudy GroupsEvents Calendar

Follow Us

LinkedInYouTubeTwitterFacebook
MPUG Logo

© 2026 MPUG. All rights reserved.

TermsPrivacySitemapAdvertise
Articles

7 Incorrect Ways to Use Microsoft Project: Using Predecessors in Summary Tasks

This is the sixth article of this series highlighting common incorrect uses of Microsoft Project. The images are built using the Microsoft Project 2013 Pro edition, but this series can be useful for all versions […]

2 min read
•over 11 years ago•Updated 3 months ago•
E
Erik van HurckAuthor
Project Management
Microsoft Project
Best Practices
Productivity
E
Erik van Hurck

Content Writer

Erik van Hurck is a Senior PPM consultant for Projectum, a western European Microsoft Partner with offices in Denmark and The Netherlands. On top of that Erik is a Microsoft MVP. As such, Erik assists enterprise customers to adopt the new Power Platform cloud solutions for Project and Portfolio Management. Beyond writing for MPUG, Erik also has a personal blog (www.theprojectcornerblog.com).

View all articles by Erik van Hurck
Related Content

Continue Reading

Discover more insights and articles that complement your current reading

Are You Running a Risk Meeting or a Risk Workshop?
Articles
1 min read

Are You Running a Risk Meeting or a Risk Workshop?

Learn the difference between a risk meeting and a risk workshop, and why structured risk workshops help project teams identify owners, define actions, and protect project outcomes.

A
Anonymous
4 days ago
Read
“I Need a Dashboard by Friday” – How AI Just Made That Possible
Articles
1 min read

“I Need a Dashboard by Friday” – How AI Just Made That Possible

Need a dashboard by Friday? Discover how AI tools like ChatGPT can help you build an Excel dashboard quickly and easily—no advanced technical skills required. Learn how to turn plain-English requests into real, working reports with spreadsheets that actually work for you.

A
Anonymous
4 days ago
Read
Why Tools Matter More Than Ever in Project Management (And Why Most Organizations Still Get Them Wrong)
Articles
1 min read

Why Tools Matter More Than Ever in Project Management (And Why Most Organizations Still Get Them Wrong)

Most PPM tools fail because they’re built for oversight, not adoption. Here’s how to design for decisions instead, and why Smartsheet bridges the gap.

A
Anonymous
6 days ago
Read
Explore All Articles